Tuesday, October 13, 2009

People Leave Managers Not Companies. Really?

People Leave Managers Not Companies. This is the statement that Marcus B is making in the book; ‘first, break all the rules’. This is also the philosophy that Gallup is pushing around. This statement is being applauded, quoted and communicated by many HR professionals. This is just another management jargon, one that is very convenient for the HR team in any organization. Bring on any ‘employee friendly’ policy, reorg experiments, compensation confusions and layer upon layer of abstractions in the HR processes and when attrition increases can blame (or at least share the blame) the managers. ‘Managers’ is a faceless entity when it is abstracted at the organization level, so you are blaming a faceless, generic group, rather than being specific and taking the bottom-line for the many failed initiatives -rather convenient isn't it?

This statement could possibly (only ever so slightly) be true if the lower requirements as indicated by the Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs get fulfilled. This maturity can only come in a developed job market where the national GDP is stable and salary for similar roles are fairly equal across organizations. In a developing country; where the needs at the lower levels of the pyramid are unfulfilled, the National GDP keeps fluctuating, salary levels uneven across organizations for similar roles, the reasons for people to leave an organization would be salary, position and location and in an organization of mostly freshers it could be even higher studies. Moreover the culture across these markets are radically different, people needs are very different.

Yes, it is a tough challenge if you get a really bad manager who is unreasonable, bad mouthed or unconcerned about the team and primarily after his own visibility. It is very frustrating to compete with your own manager. The only option would be to quit and move on. But concluding bad managers as the only or primary reason for people quitting organization is pushing the generalization a bit too far. It is sheer desperation and passing on the buck to faceless group of people or merely a matter of convenience.

Truth is, manager is just another cog in the organization wheel; larger the wheel (organization) smaller the cog (manager) becomes. With many standardized and normalization processes the role of a manager is becoming smaller and smaller; one has to just feed in the list and rest taken care by the xls (or an application if your organization has mature people practices :-)).

PS: Abraham Maslow's book ‘Motivation and Personality’, published in 1954 introduced the Hierarchy of Needs, which states that Human motivation moves up a pyramid as each level gets fulfilled and this is a concept that every MBA student is very much familiar with and used for various subjects, like psychology, HR, marketing, etc.

6 comments:

  1. Anonymous5:02 PM

    No. I disagree.

    People leave organisations if their goals are not aligned. All through working career the individual has twin goals. One is a monetary goal and other is a career goal. Many are unwilling to compromise on one for the other.

    Always they strive to reach a win-win situation. Fortunately both these goals are not in different directions...Mostly they run as a close parallel line...

    As pointed out by Malcolm Gladwell in 'Outliers'
    beyond IQ or the competence to perform the job, what is required is practical intelligence to survive in an organisation....People rarely get sacked for competence....if their practical intelligence is so poor that if they are not able to cover up their lack of competence the workplace becomes a nightmare....they keep jumping organisations and blame managers....

    Kathir

    ReplyDelete
  2. I must admit, i have not read any review on this particular book. but a general forward mail on-the topic with a more direct blame on the immediate superiors.u sound moderate, may be that is the tone of the book.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I have seen the other way too. When a manager had quit in my earlier org., people started resigning as a cascading effect - some joined him too [ we knew the successor :) ]. EOD, everything becomes personal, officially :). Thanks for the book intro, Krishna.

    -Visu.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Krishna,

    Thought provoking. You have summed up well.

    When I saw the title, my thought was initially - yes, people leave for bad managers. Is that the only reason? Certainly not.

    A manager in a “medium to large” org - does not operate in a vacuum. On the one side, he has org policies and on the other side he has people reporting to him. There are finite things a boss can do. period.

    As you rightly pointed out, managers are a faceless group and HR is a real entity (and also vocal). So you really hear only one side of the story. Media likes clichés and hence this becomes a big thing to talk about...

    Assuming that bad managers are the real reason in a company for people leaving org - let us say 13% attrition in a company, does the org has so many bad managers – why there is no great/concrete action on the part of HR to correct this other than whining about it….

    There are many reasons for a person leaving org and bad manager is certainly just one of them. Career aspirations, earning potential, how safe the position is, long term location goal etc are the high level reasons for people moving...

    I do not know why people (orgs, media) want one simple answer (like drinking 2 cups of coffee/day keeps Alzheimer’s away – in reality, it is a BS) for any complex problem (any issue where humans are involved)….

    Thanks

    Venkat

    ReplyDelete
  5. Both "People Leave Managers Not Companies" and "People Leave Companies Not Managers" are true depending on situation. Many of my friends from current and earlier companies left organizations but not bcoz of managers. Manager,Money,Team,Position...one or all of them could be the reason to leave.

    "Manager is just another cog in the organization wheel" very well said :)

    Cheers
    Ajay

    ReplyDelete
  6. @ Rajan: this is Gallup's concept and hence there is no moderation. They very strongly believe in this.
    @ Visu, who is the successor? Send a mail :-)
    @ Venkat: "Simple solutions to complex problems", this is exactly what i was thinking, but somehow left out while posting and you have said the same words. - this is correct. we arrive at simple solutions for complex problems and complex solutions for simple issues.
    @ Ajay: Yes, both are true. When you get a nasty manager (yes, there are many such managers!) you leave because of the manager, but manager can't be the sole reason for attrition.
    Thanks Kathir, totally agree.

    ReplyDelete